Understanding management accountants’ satisfaction: A conceptual study

Nikhil Chandra Shil et al.

Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems (JAMIS)2021https://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2021.02003article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.38

What the paper says

The study attempts to explain management accountants' satisfaction in terms of the job they do and the system they use, develops a profile of factors impacting such satisfaction, and analyzes the implications of satisfaction on contextual factors like value creation, profitability etc. Design / Methodology / Approach: Based on a structured questionnaire survey, the study deploys a quantitative research methodology to identify the satisfiers of management accountants covering a rich profile of respondents from 113 manufacturing firms having their headquarters located in Dhaka, the capital city of Bangladesh. Contingency approach primarily leads to develop the basic theme of the study and it adopts positivistic paradigm of quantitative research. The results are analyzed through different descriptive and inferential statistical tools to draw conclusions through inductive method.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2021.02003

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nikhil2021,
  title        = {{Understanding management accountants’ satisfaction: A conceptual study}},
  author       = {Nikhil Chandra Shil et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems (JAMIS)},
  year         = {2021},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2021.02003},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Understanding management accountants’ satisfaction: A conceptual study

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.38

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.08 × 0.4 = 0.03
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.