Common Pressures, Uneven Trajectories: The Variegated Europeanisation of Wage Regulation Institutions

Vincenzo Maccarrone

British Journal of Industrial Relations2026https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.70038article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The debate on whether national industrial relations (IR) are experiencing convergence is a long‐standing one. Recently, scholars argue that we are witnessing a neoliberal convergence of national IR, understood as an increase in employers’ discretion. Much of this discussion has focused on countries of the European Union (EU) as empirical test cases. Hence, this debate has intertwined with that on the effects of the process of European integration on national IR. Drawing insights from the economic geography literature and the perspective of ‘variegated neoliberalisation’, this article argues that neoliberalisation and Europeanisation on IR should be seen as intertwined processes, which are, however, constitutively variegated. Through a multi‐level research design, the article applies this theoretical framework to one key function of national IR, that is, wage regulation, with a focus on Ireland and Italy.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.70038

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{vincenzo2026,
  title        = {{Common Pressures, Uneven Trajectories: The Variegated Europeanisation of Wage Regulation Institutions}},
  author       = {Vincenzo Maccarrone},
  journal      = {British Journal of Industrial Relations},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.70038},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Common Pressures, Uneven Trajectories: The Variegated Europeanisation of Wage Regulation Institutions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.