Trading Away Development: Context and Prospects of the EU-Mercosur Agreement

Jeronim Capaldo & Özlem Ömer Cender

International Journal of Political Economy2025https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2025.2464973article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.40

What the paper says

When assessing the economic effects of a new free trade agreement, projections with Computable General Equilibrium models have long been considered the gold standard. However, these models are usually constructed in a way that excludes negative outcomes on employment, inequality and economic development. Alternatively, simpler statistical analysis may be more informative. In this article, we take up the proposed EU-MERCOSUR agreement as an example and propose a method that can be easily replicated to analyze the sector-level composition of the participating economies and the implications for growth, employment, inequality and development. Our analysis points to the emergence of dual economies in most countries, low productivity, and low-wage sectors expanding too fast, a trend that can be aggravated by trade liberalization.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2025.2464973

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jeronim2025,
  title        = {{Trading Away Development: Context and Prospects of the EU-Mercosur Agreement}},
  author       = {Jeronim Capaldo & Özlem Ömer Cender},
  journal      = {International Journal of Political Economy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2025.2464973},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Trading Away Development: Context and Prospects of the EU-Mercosur Agreement

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.40

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.