arbiter
JournalsAccount

To Be or Not to Be a Worker: Legal Uncertainty and Precarious Employment in the European Union

Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen et al.

Journal of Common Market Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70104article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Precarious employment has gradually moved onto the European Union (EU) policy agenda, so far culminating in the proclamation of the European Pillar of Social Rights (the Pillar). However, the effectiveness of these renewed social ambitions is challenged by legal uncertainty and entangled in ongoing political and legal disputes over the definition of ‘worker’ under EU law. This article examines how EU political and legal dynamics respond to the legal uncertainty faced by those in precarious employment and how these responses condition effective protection for those at the margins of the labour market. It explores the contested definition of ‘worker’ and analyses two recent legislative initiatives: the Directive on Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions and the Platform Work Directive. The article finds that persistent political and legal disagreements continue to fuel legal uncertainty for precarious workers. Access to labour rights and social protection remains tied to worker status – a status that is still primarily defined at the national level.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70104

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{dorte2026,
  title        = {{To Be or Not to Be a Worker: Legal Uncertainty and Precarious Employment in the European Union}},
  author       = {Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Common Market Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70104},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

To Be or Not to Be a Worker: Legal Uncertainty and Precarious Employment in the European Union

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.