Exploring Innovation in Start-ups: Effectuation Rethought through the Prism of the Gift Logic

Virginie Gallegro Roquelaure & Ludivine Aadla

International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeim.2025.10069281article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This article explores the emergence and development of innovation in startups by establishing an original link between Sarasvathy's (2008) effectuation approach and Mauss's (1954) theory of gift/counter-gift. This study thus aims to propose a new reading of the innovation process through the principles of effectuation rethought through the prism of the gift logic. Qualitative research was conducted at a world-leading HealthTech startup. The results point to five principles: start by drawing on a stock of gifts, create a patchwork quilt by cooperating, leverage relationships, think in terms of trust, and become the pilot of gift exchanges. Finally, key implications are drawn for innovation in startups.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeim.2025.10069281

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{virginie2025,
  title        = {{Exploring Innovation in Start-ups: Effectuation Rethought through the Prism of the Gift Logic}},
  author       = {Virginie Gallegro Roquelaure & Ludivine Aadla},
  journal      = {International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeim.2025.10069281},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Exploring Innovation in Start-ups: Effectuation Rethought through the Prism of the Gift Logic

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.