← Back to results An Analysis of Trump’s Tariff Policy Nilanjan Banik & Pranjal Chandrakar
Abstract In this article we examine the rationale for Trump’s tariffs. We argue that while tariffs are problematic as a policy instrument, the Trump administration is strategically deploying them in an attempt to address large current account deficits. We identify the countries that are most vulnerable to Trump’s tariffs. We measure vulnerability by calculating the share of each country's exports to the US relative to their GDP. As an exercise, we examine the bilateral trade of the US with Canada, China, India, and Mexico.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.71279/epw.v60i49.43760 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{nilanjan2026,
title = {{An Analysis of Trump’s Tariff Policy}},
author = {Nilanjan Banik & Pranjal Chandrakar},
journal = {Economic and Political Weekly},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.71279/epw.v60i49.43760},
} TY - JOUR
TI - An Analysis of Trump’s Tariff Policy
AU - Banik, Nilanjan
AU - Chandrakar, Pranjal
JO - Economic and Political Weekly
PY - 2026
ER - Nilanjan Banik & Pranjal Chandrakar (2026). An Analysis of Trump’s Tariff Policy. *Economic and Political Weekly*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.71279/epw.v60i49.43760 Nilanjan Banik & Pranjal Chandrakar. "An Analysis of Trump’s Tariff Policy." *Economic and Political Weekly* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.71279/epw.v60i49.43760. An Analysis of Trump’s Tariff Policy
Nilanjan Banik & Pranjal Chandrakar · Economic and Political Weekly · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.71279/epw.v60i49.43760 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.