← Back to results Weak Aggregating Algorithm for prediction with expert advice and adversarial bandit frameworks Yuri Kalnishkan
Abstract This paper surveys the Weak Aggregating Algorithm for prediction with expert advice under bounded convex loss functions. It shows how bounds for various scenarios can be obtained and explicates the connection with the adversarial bandit framework. The paper is aimed at practitioners wishing to apply the algorithms in real-life situations.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2026.105447 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{yuri2026,
title = {{Weak Aggregating Algorithm for prediction with expert advice and adversarial bandit frameworks}},
author = {Yuri Kalnishkan},
journal = {Information and Computation},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2026.105447},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Weak Aggregating Algorithm for prediction with expert advice and adversarial bandit frameworks
AU - Kalnishkan, Yuri
JO - Information and Computation
PY - 2026
ER - Yuri Kalnishkan (2026). Weak Aggregating Algorithm for prediction with expert advice and adversarial bandit frameworks. *Information and Computation*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2026.105447 Yuri Kalnishkan. "Weak Aggregating Algorithm for prediction with expert advice and adversarial bandit frameworks." *Information and Computation* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2026.105447. Weak Aggregating Algorithm for prediction with expert advice and adversarial bandit frameworks
Yuri Kalnishkan · Information and Computation · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2026.105447 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.