Silence or Solidarity? The Political Pitfalls of an LGBTQI Avoidance Strategy in Hungary

Phillip M. Ayoub & Sam Whitt

Comparative Politics2026https://doi.org/10.5129/001041526x17734964392222article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Amid rising illiberal anti-LGBTQI backlash, some opposition politicians fear that resisting it is a political trap that could jeopardize their electoral fortunes. We evaluate this concern in Hungary, where Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz government passed a law banning Pride marches. The leading opposition figure, Péter Magyar of Tisza, initially avoided opposing the law, ostensibly to protect his party’s future electoral prospects. In a May 2025 survey experiment, we find that this “avoidance” strategy reduces Magyar’s approval while failing to increase support for his party. Theoretically, we conceptualize a value-credibility cost mechanism through which elite silence diminishes moral authority, cedes issue ownership, and weakens support for LGBTQI rights. Our results, buttressed by interviews with LGBTQI organizers, contribute to a literature on the costs and benefits of minority rights inclusion in electoral strategy.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5129/001041526x17734964392222

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{phillip2026,
  title        = {{Silence or Solidarity? The Political Pitfalls of an LGBTQI Avoidance Strategy in Hungary}},
  author       = {Phillip M. Ayoub & Sam Whitt},
  journal      = {Comparative Politics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5129/001041526x17734964392222},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Silence or Solidarity? The Political Pitfalls of an LGBTQI Avoidance Strategy in Hungary

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.