arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Role of Pre-Audit Financial Reporting Quality in Detecting Audit Quality: Implications for Sample Selection

Limei Che et al.

Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory2025https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2023-139article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

SUMMARY This paper examines the importance of appropriate sample selection in empirical research on audit quality, particularly focusing on how pre-audit financial reporting quality (FRQ) affects the ability to detect audit quality. Because post-audit FRQ is jointly determined by audit quality and pre-audit FRQ, high pre-audit FRQ may constrain the auditor’s capability to make measurable improvements, thereby obscuring evidence of high audit quality. This study develops a proxy for clients’ pre-audit FRQ and stratifies the sample accordingly. Using the Big 4 effect setting as the primary context, we find that the positive effects of high audit quality are most observable among clients with low pre-audit FRQ, whereas such effects are not evident among clients with high pre-audit FRQ. These findings are robust to alternative specifications, including the use of industry specialist auditors and various sensitivity analyses. Future research on audit quality could consider the role of pre-audit FRQ in sample selection. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M42.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2023-139

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{limei2025,
  title        = {{The Role of Pre-Audit Financial Reporting Quality in Detecting Audit Quality: Implications for Sample Selection}},
  author       = {Limei Che et al.},
  journal      = {Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2023-139},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Role of Pre-Audit Financial Reporting Quality in Detecting Audit Quality: Implications for Sample Selection

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.