arbiter
JournalsAccount

When workplace incivility arises: can knowledge sharing still survive?

Yu Zhao et al.

Journal of Knowledge Management2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-09-2025-1347article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore how workplace incivility affects employees’ knowledge sharing, focusing on the mediating role of rumination and the moderating roles of neuroticism and relational energy. Design/methodology/approach Guided by social exchange theory and self-verification theories, this study uses a mixed-methods approach. A survey tested a moderated mediation model, and qualitative interviews offered deeper insights into employees’ experiences. Findings Results show workplace incivility reduces knowledge sharing through rumination. Neuroticism intensifies this effect, while relational energy buffers it. These qualitative findings supported and enriched the results. Originality/value This study advances the literature by integrating social exchange and self-verification theories to explain both the cognitive mechanism (rumination) and boundary conditions (neuroticism and relational energy) underlying the effects of workplace incivility on knowledge sharing. The findings offer actionable insights for organizations to develop targeted interventions that reduce rumination, increase relational energy and support emotionally vulnerable employees, thereby sustaining knowledge sharing during workplace challenges. Organizations are encouraged to implement interventions that reduce employee rumination, build relational energy through supportive interactions and provide targeted support for employees with high neuroticism to maintain effective knowledge sharing.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-09-2025-1347

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yu2026,
  title        = {{When workplace incivility arises: can knowledge sharing still survive?}},
  author       = {Yu Zhao et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Knowledge Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-09-2025-1347},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

When workplace incivility arises: can knowledge sharing still survive?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.