The Evolution of Private Equity and the Change in General Partner Compensation Terms in the 1980s

Stephen Fraidin & Meredith C. Foster

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law2019article
ABDC B
Weight
0.43

Abstract

While the business model of private equity has remained largely unchanged since the 1980s, private equity as an industry has undergone a dramatic transformation. In the early 1980s, private equity was both highly profitable and highly controversial. Today, on the other hand, it is an important asset class and its returns are modest. This paper will document both of these changes and identify the several factors that contributed simultaneously to private equity’s declining profitability and to its increasing public acceptance. This paper will also identify another change that private equity underwent in the 1980s, which has been largely ignored: the change in how private equity fund managers are compensated. The change in manager compensation had a material impact on the industry. While heralded as unequivocally positive for private equity investors, these compensation terms created new agency costs between investors and private equity managers and contributed to the increasing significance of fixed compensation in private equity.

3 citations

Cite this paper

@article{stephen2019,
  title        = {{The Evolution of Private Equity and the Change in General Partner Compensation Terms in the 1980s}},
  author       = {Stephen Fraidin & Meredith C. Foster},
  journal      = {Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law},
  year         = {2019},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Evolution of Private Equity and the Change in General Partner Compensation Terms in the 1980s

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.43

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.21 × 0.4 = 0.08
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.