arbiter
JournalsAccount

Venture capital as male-lens investing

Judy Wajcman et al.

Cambridge Journal of Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beag008article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Venture capital (VC) is fuelling the boom in artificial intelligence (AI). Yet analysis of a UK dataset reveals that VC is dominated by men, both as investors and the AI start-ups they fund. Gender disparities are identified in VC decision-makers, the composition of founders and the average capital raised by predominantly male, compared to female, teams. This is particularly pronounced in AI software start-ups, the sector that attracts most investment. Whether and how this gender gap shapes the innovation process itself is a further question explored here. Drawing on feminist science and technology studies, we argue that the homogeneity of the VC ecosystem is key to perpetuating the gender gap in innovation. On this basis, we conceptualise venture capital as effectively a form of ‘male-lens investing’, illustrating the limitations of the male-dominated and profit-driven VC investment model. We believe this theoretical framing contributes to contextualising debates about the need for inclusive innovation systems.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beag008

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{judy2026,
  title        = {{Venture capital as male-lens investing}},
  author       = {Judy Wajcman et al.},
  journal      = {Cambridge Journal of Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beag008},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Venture capital as male-lens investing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.