arbiter
JournalsAccount

Integrated Reporting in the Public Sector: Theoretical Foundations and Determinants of Quality

Ana Zorio‐Grima & Andreea Hancu‐Budui

Business Strategy and the Environment2026https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70542article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Integrated reporting (IR) has gained attention as the IFRS Foundation promotes its use through the International Integrated Reporting Council framework (IIRF). Public sector (PS) organizations, as key drivers of economic, social and environmental sustainability, are increasingly adopting IR to enhance transparency and accountability. This study examines the theoretical foundations of IR adoption in the PS and evaluates factors contributing to higher compliance with the IIRF. Through content analysis of 62 PS entities worldwide, we find that adherence to Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards, sustainable development goals (SDG) reporting and external assurance significantly enhance IR quality. Our findings confirm institutional isomorphism as the dominant theoretical explanation for IR adoption in the PS, as organizations mimic best practices from peers rather than being driven by legitimacy or stakeholder pressures. This study contributes to the literature by providing a larger and more comprehensive dataset than previous studies, offering insights into the evolving role of IR in the PS.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70542

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ana2026,
  title        = {{Integrated Reporting in the Public Sector: Theoretical Foundations and Determinants of Quality}},
  author       = {Ana Zorio‐Grima & Andreea Hancu‐Budui},
  journal      = {Business Strategy and the Environment},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70542},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Integrated Reporting in the Public Sector: Theoretical Foundations and Determinants of Quality

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.