Of love and loss: Negotiating masculinity and care in families of autistic children in China

Kefan Xue & Xiaorong Gu

Current Sociology2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921261426573article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are underdiagnosed, underprivileged and under-supported in China. Families, particularly parents, often become primary caregivers, but research on fathers’ caregiving experiences remains sparse compared to mothers’. Understanding fathers’ roles is critical for promoting shared caregiving responsibilities and family well-being. This study analyzes publicly available we-media data of 33 family stories written by 23 fathers of autistic children. Drawing on Bridges and Pascoe’s hybrid masculinities framework, the study explores three interconnected processes: fathers’ emotional responses to their child’s diagnosis, the redistribution of caregiving within families and the emergence of ‘carer-intervener’ identities. By centering fathers’ own accounts in a Global South context, the article contributes new empirical insight to disability and care scholarship, extends theorization of hybrid masculinities by tracing discursive distancing and boundary-fortifying practices in caregiving and highlights policy implications for supporting fathers of children with ASD without reinforcing gendered double standards.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921261426573

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kefan2026,
  title        = {{Of love and loss: Negotiating masculinity and care in families of autistic children in China}},
  author       = {Kefan Xue & Xiaorong Gu},
  journal      = {Current Sociology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921261426573},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Of love and loss: Negotiating masculinity and care in families of autistic children in China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.