arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Análisis comparativo de las respuestas estatales de tres países a la crisis financiera internacional, 2008-2012

Lucas Nieto Catania

Ciclos: en la historia, la economia y la sociedad2024https://doi.org/10.56503/ciclos/nro.62(2024)/3117article
ABDC C
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

This paper analyses the economic trajectories of Argentina, Spain, and the United States during the period 2008-2012 in the context of the global financial crisis and their policy responses, focusing on key economic and social variables such as GDP, unemployment, inflation, labour market, public spending, and external sector. The study concludes that Argentina experienced a rapid recovery due to the implementation of countercyclical policies, but later faced stagnation due to external vulnerabilities. Spain worsened the recession, particularly labour indicators, within a framework of austerity policies. Lastly, the United States implemented countercyclical policies with a slower but more prolonged recovery. This comparative study highlights the importance of calibrating fiscal and monetary policies to mitigate recessive exogenous shocks.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56503/ciclos/nro.62(2024)/3117

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lucas2024,
  title        = {{Análisis comparativo de las respuestas estatales de tres países a la crisis financiera internacional, 2008-2012}},
  author       = {Lucas Nieto Catania},
  journal      = {Ciclos: en la historia, la economia y la sociedad},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56503/ciclos/nro.62(2024)/3117},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Análisis comparativo de las respuestas estatales de tres países a la crisis financiera internacional, 2008-2012

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.