When Using the “N-Word” Goes Wrong: Black Americans’ Perceptions and Affective Responses of Those Who Use the “N-Word”

Sheba M. Aikawa et al.

Journal of Language and Social Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x251411967article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The “n-word” remains one of the most offensive racial slurs, yet it is used by both Black and non-Black individuals. Across three studies (total N = 1,063), we examined how Black people perceive its use based on the speaker's racial identity and racial self-identification, while also varying valence and context. In Study 1, we varied the target race who used the n-word (Black, Black–White biracial, White); in Study 2, we manipulated the valence in which the n-word was used (positive or negative); and in Study 3, we explored how a biracial person racially self-identified (Black-identified, biracial-identified, or Black-disidentified) shaped reactions. Black participants reported more negative perceptions and affective responses when a White (Studies 1 and 2) or Black-disidentified biracial (Study 3) target used the word, compared to Black, Black–White biracial (Studies 1 and 2), or Black-identified biracial (Study 3) targets, highlighting how racial identity shapes perceptions of those who use racial slurs.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x251411967

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sheba2026,
  title        = {{When Using the “N-Word” Goes Wrong: Black Americans’ Perceptions and Affective Responses of Those Who Use the “N-Word”}},
  author       = {Sheba M. Aikawa et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Language and Social Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x251411967},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

When Using the “N-Word” Goes Wrong: Black Americans’ Perceptions and Affective Responses of Those Who Use the “N-Word”

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.