arbiter
JournalsAccount

Differentiated by Design? Cross‐Border Cooperation in Europe as Differentiated Integration From Below

Georg Wenzelburger & Stefanie Thurm

Journal of Common Market Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70091article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Differentiated integration has become a central concept in contemporary theorizing about European integration, reflecting the increasingly multi‐speed, multi‐tier and multi‐menu nature of integration within the European Union (EU). This research note extends the conceptual lens of differentiated integration to the level of cross‐border regions. We argue that variation in speed, depth and territorial scope of integration across cross‐border regions arises both from differing levels of regional engagement and from differing support and initiatives at the member state level. The result is a patchwork pattern of cross‐border integration across Europe. We further explore the causes of cross‐border regional differentiated integration as well as its consequences and its potential to shape European integration as a whole. Specifically, we identify institutional and societal channels through which cross‐border policy ideas may diffuse vertically and horizontally and potentially influence public attitudes in border regions towards EU and cross‐border integration.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70091

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{georg2026,
  title        = {{Differentiated by Design? Cross‐Border Cooperation in Europe as Differentiated Integration From Below}},
  author       = {Georg Wenzelburger & Stefanie Thurm},
  journal      = {Journal of Common Market Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70091},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Differentiated by Design? Cross‐Border Cooperation in Europe as Differentiated Integration From Below

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.