The Ford Foundation and the development of international relations in China

Shuhong Huo et al.

Review of International Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210525101691article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract Current explanations of Sino–American relations are dominated by realist and liberal understandings of world politics, neglecting crucial transnational actors that complexify Sino–American relations. In contrast and drawing from internationally informed Gramscian hegemony theory, and on extensive archival work, we offer an alternative complex multidimensional transnational account. By researching the Ford Foundation’s activities in China and the United States, specifically its contribution to the development of the international relations (IR) discipline in China, we break new ground and show that Ford was key in profoundly shaping Sino–American relations, especially by developing transnational knowledge networks. These transnational elite networks simultaneously integrated China into the LIO and had unintended consequences, particularly in encouraging Chinese counter-hegemonic dynamics that challenge the LIO from within. Our approach indicates a richer complexity of Sino–US relations than extant theories, suggesting that the future trajectories of this strategic relationship are uncertain and do not fall neatly into an inevitable war or peaceful interdependence binary.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210525101691

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shuhong2026,
  title        = {{The Ford Foundation and the development of international relations in China}},
  author       = {Shuhong Huo et al.},
  journal      = {Review of International Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210525101691},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Ford Foundation and the development of international relations in China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.