arbiter
JournalsAccount

Erratum: Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review

Unknown author

Journal of Organizational Change Management2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-12-2025-1091article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

It has come to the attention of the publisher that an earlier version of this article was published initially as He, Y. and Jing, J. (2024), “Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2024-538.The correct citation for this article is He Y, Jing J (2026), “Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review”. Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-07-2024-0419.The originally published article has an equivalent note placed on it to guide readers to the correct version of the article.The publisher apologises for this confusion.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-12-2025-1091

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Erratum: Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Journal of Organizational Change Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-12-2025-1091},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Erratum: Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.