Assessing the middle-income trap in post-Soviet countries: Evidence from unit root tests

Nijat Gasim et al.

Journal of International Studies2025https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2025/18-1/10article
AJG 1
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

This study investigates whether post-Soviet countries are caught in the middle-income trap, using the Robertson and Ye (2013) approach. A comprehensive set of unit root tests was employed, including traditional tests (ADF), nonlinear tests (KSS, Kruse, Sollis), and advanced Fourier-based tests (FKPSS, FF-ADF, FADF, FKSS, FKruse, FSollis) to analyze the data spanning from 1990 to 2023. The results revealed a significant heterogeneity in convergence patterns across the countries. It can be concluded that Moldova, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, and Georgia exhibited stationarity in most tests, indicating that these countries are in the middle-income trap. In contrast, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Russia, and Ukraine displayed non-stationary results, suggesting that they are not in the trap and are converging toward higher income levels. In addition, the radar chart, coefficient of variation, and three different Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis techniques (Equal Weight Score, Discrimination Weighted Score, and Entropy Weighted Score) were used for robustness check. The results of these tests appear to be consistent with the outcomes of the unit root tests.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2025/18-1/10

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nijat2025,
  title        = {{Assessing the middle-income trap in post-Soviet countries: Evidence from unit root tests}},
  author       = {Nijat Gasim et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of International Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2025/18-1/10},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Assessing the middle-income trap in post-Soviet countries: Evidence from unit root tests

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.