arbiter
JournalsAccount

Rewarding the Right Way: The Effects of Forced Rating Systems on Creative Performance in Groups

Matthias Felix Sinnemann et al.

Behavioral Research in Accounting2026https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-2024-012article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Subjective performance evaluation (SPE) has become a prevalent method for assessing employee performance in creative group tasks. However, the role of intragroup competition in SPE remains unclear. This study experimentally examines how SPE frameworks impact performance in creative tasks by varying levels of intragroup competition through a forced rating system (FRS), which reflects higher competition, and an unrestricted rating system (URS), which reflects lower competition. Our findings demonstrate that groups operating under an FRS achieve higher creative performance than those under a URS, outperforming them in both idea generation and idea selection. A post-experimental video analysis of collaborative behaviors indicates that heightened competition, as facilitated by an FRS, reduces free riding and increases speaking time and verbal interruptions, thus promoting a more dynamic and productive idea generation and selection process. Data Availability: Experimental data are available upon request.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-2024-012

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{matthias2026,
  title        = {{Rewarding the Right Way: The Effects of Forced Rating Systems on Creative Performance in Groups}},
  author       = {Matthias Felix Sinnemann et al.},
  journal      = {Behavioral Research in Accounting},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-2024-012},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Rewarding the Right Way: The Effects of Forced Rating Systems on Creative Performance in Groups

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.