Understanding, Predicting, and Preventing Suicide: Recent Advances Using Digital and Computational Methods

Matthew K. Nock & Shirley B. Wang

Current Directions in Psychological Science2026https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214251414021article
AJG 4
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Suicide is among the most perplexing of all human behaviors. It has been a leading cause of death for decades, and despite significant study it continues unabated. Over the past few years, the development of new digital and computational methods has provided tools that are helping to overcome many long-standing challenges to studying suicide. Here we review recent advances in the understanding, prediction, and prevention of suicidal behaviors using such methods. Examples include the use of mathematical and computational modeling to build and test more precise theories of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, large-scale electronic databases to better detect and predict those at risk for suicide (e.g., health-care networks, social media, and other web-based platforms), smartphones and wearable biosensors to identify person-specific high-risk periods, and digital devices and platforms to deliver and test just-in-time adaptive interventions. Although suicide is a long-standing problem, these advances are facilitating significant progress and hope for the future of suicide prevention.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214251414021

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{matthew2026,
  title        = {{Understanding, Predicting, and Preventing Suicide: Recent Advances Using Digital and Computational Methods}},
  author       = {Matthew K. Nock & Shirley B. Wang},
  journal      = {Current Directions in Psychological Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214251414021},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Understanding, Predicting, and Preventing Suicide: Recent Advances Using Digital and Computational Methods

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.