Organizing Regenerative Supply Chains: How to Collectively Synergize With Social‐Ecological Systems

Jury Gualandris et al.

Journal of Supply Chain Management2026https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.70022article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Regenerative supply chains are essential to social‐ecological wellbeing but have proven difficult to organize. This editorial builds upon the principles introduced by Gualandris et al. (2024) to theorize two novel structural dimensions that are critical to organizing regenerative supply chains: eco‐effective organizing and community‐like organizing. In developing these dimensions, supply chain members can improve the marginal productivity of misplaced or degraded resources while strengthening relationships to each other and to their bioregions. Together, the two dimensions underpin the ability of supply chain members to see the benefits of collectively contributing to improvements in social‐ecological systems despite self‐interested incentives in competitive marketplaces. This editorial also presents an overview of the articles published in the JSCM Special Issue on Regenerative Supply Chains , noting the way each article expands the understanding of regenerative supply chains. This editorial concludes with promising avenues for future research concerning the development, functioning, and competitive dynamics of regenerative supply chains.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.70022

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jury2026,
  title        = {{Organizing Regenerative Supply Chains: How to Collectively Synergize With Social‐Ecological Systems}},
  author       = {Jury Gualandris et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Supply Chain Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.70022},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Organizing Regenerative Supply Chains: How to Collectively Synergize With Social‐Ecological Systems

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.