A Unified Model of Investor Utility and Asset Pricing

Emilian Belev & Dan diBartolomeo

Journal of Investing2026https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2026.1.384article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article develops a new and intuitive expression of investor utility. It starts with an empirical test of a general valuation model applied to three popular publicly traded market composites. The experiment compares the price estimates of the model to a traditional model that reflects mean-variance efficiency. Thereafter, we formally justify the usage of the proposed model. Its derivation is based on maximizing the logarithm of investor wealth. In contrast to prior work with a similar premise, we explicitly incorporate the investor time horizon, discretionary consumption, and potential investor default to determine loss aversion. We treat both borrowing and future expenditure as leverage. The resulting utility objective is finally directly transformed into a valuation model. The model is not limited to a specific probability distribution of asset returns. Although it conforms to markets where no-arbitrage conditions exist, it does not require such conditions. This makes it suitable for the valuation of illiquid assets, like private equity and private credit.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2026.1.384

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{emilian2026,
  title        = {{A Unified Model of Investor Utility and Asset Pricing}},
  author       = {Emilian Belev & Dan diBartolomeo},
  journal      = {Journal of Investing},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2026.1.384},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Unified Model of Investor Utility and Asset Pricing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.