A Comment on the Gibbard–Satterthwaite Theorem

Daniel Sandroni & Alvaro Sandroni

The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2024-0095article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper re-examines the Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem when some anomalous choice functions are allowed. We show non-dictatorial social aggregators that limit manipulation and non-dictatorial social aggregators do not permit manipulation.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2024-0095

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{daniel2025,
  title        = {{A Comment on the Gibbard–Satterthwaite Theorem}},
  author       = {Daniel Sandroni & Alvaro Sandroni},
  journal      = {The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2024-0095},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Comment on the Gibbard–Satterthwaite Theorem

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.