← Back to results A Comment on the Gibbard–Satterthwaite Theorem Daniel Sandroni & Alvaro Sandroni
What the paper says This paper re-examines the Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem when some anomalous choice functions are allowed. We show non-dictatorial social aggregators that limit manipulation and non-dictatorial social aggregators do not permit manipulation.
Open paper page → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2024-0095 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{daniel2025,
title = {{A Comment on the Gibbard–Satterthwaite Theorem}},
author = {Daniel Sandroni & Alvaro Sandroni},
journal = {The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics},
year = {2025},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2024-0095},
} TY - JOUR
TI - A Comment on the Gibbard–Satterthwaite Theorem
AU - Sandroni, Daniel
AU - Sandroni, Alvaro
JO - The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics
PY - 2025
ER - Daniel Sandroni & Alvaro Sandroni (2025). A Comment on the Gibbard–Satterthwaite Theorem. *The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2024-0095 Daniel Sandroni & Alvaro Sandroni. "A Comment on the Gibbard–Satterthwaite Theorem." *The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics* (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2024-0095. A Comment on the Gibbard–Satterthwaite Theorem
Daniel Sandroni & Alvaro Sandroni · The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics · 2025
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2024-0095 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.