Wellbeing of the Young in Africa

David G Blanchflower & Alex Bryson

Journal of African Economies2025https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejaf016article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Research over decades finds wellbeing is U-shaped in age, while illbeing is hump-shaped. But growing evidence from around the world suggests the wellbeing of the young is declining such that it now rises with age, while illbeing falls. Using data from a number of surveys on fifty-four countries, we examine trends in wellbeing in Africa where there has been little prior research. We find little support for the proposition that the age structure of wellbeing in Africa has changed over the last decade. However, wellbeing appears to improve with age in surveys conducted over the internet, such as Global Minds, which may indicate the young are more susceptible to providing socially desirable responses to interviewers. One potential reason for declining wellbeing among the young in high-income countries is rising screentime linked to fast broadband access. But in countries like Burkina Faso and Guinea, the majority of the population say they have never accessed the internet. Low internet usage might help explain why the wellbeing of young Africans is not declining as it has been elsewhere.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejaf016

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{david2025,
  title        = {{Wellbeing of the Young in Africa}},
  author       = {David G Blanchflower & Alex Bryson},
  journal      = {Journal of African Economies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejaf016},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Wellbeing of the Young in Africa

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.