Management Practices, Pay, and Pay Inequality

Natália P. Monteiro & Odd Rune Straume

Journal of Labor Research2024https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-024-09357-warticle
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We use rich Portuguese data to analyse the relationship between the use of different management practices and worker pay in a large representative sample of firms. We find that the overall score on the use of management practices is significantly associated with both higher average wages and higher within-firm wage dispersion. The positive relationship between management practices and average pay is present throughout the wage distribution and for all occupational skill groups, but is stronger for workers higher up in the wage distribution and in higher-skilled occupations. These results are driven by incentives-based management practices, in particular practices related to reward and promotion of high performers in the firm. We also identify a potential moderating role of works councils. Our results suggests that, in firms with works councils, a larger share of the gains from productivity-enhancing management practices is shared with workers, and these gains are more evenly distributed across the workforce.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-024-09357-w

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{natália2024,
  title        = {{Management Practices, Pay, and Pay Inequality}},
  author       = {Natália P. Monteiro & Odd Rune Straume},
  journal      = {Journal of Labor Research},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-024-09357-w},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Management Practices, Pay, and Pay Inequality

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.49 × 0.4 = 0.19
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.