arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Legal perspectives on the influence of litigation funding on the CPO regime

Naomi Reid

Competition Law Journal2025https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2025.01.02article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Third-party litigation funding is a common part of bringing applications for a Collective Proceedings Order. This article considers some of the controversies that exist around the third-party litigation funding industry and issues the Competition Appeal Tribunal considers when considering the application for a Collective Proceedings Order and also when considering applications for settlement.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2025.01.02

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{naomi2025,
  title        = {{Legal perspectives on the influence of litigation funding on the CPO regime}},
  author       = {Naomi Reid},
  journal      = {Competition Law Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2025.01.02},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Legal perspectives on the influence of litigation funding on the CPO regime

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.