Understanding the process of starting up and managing the performance of a refugee enterprise: a critical realist case study

Jean Claude Mutiganda

International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development2026https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmed.2026.151258article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study applies a critical realist framework of agential reflexivity to investigate the process by which an African refugee woman and her family established and developed a social enterprise in London. More specifically, the study examines how agential reflexivity can help to understand the process through which a refugee entrepreneur transforms potential business opportunities into a successful business. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from a case study conducted at Bravo from 2010 to 2023. The findings show that over the years, the entrepreneurial process progressed through fractured, autonomous, communicative, and metareflexive processes. The entrepreneur combined strategic decisions with routine actions that were adapted to each business context. Potential business opportunities continued to emerge, and the reflexive entrepreneur transformed them into a successful venture, illustrating how the process of structural conditioning and internal conversation actualised the realisation of business potential.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmed.2026.151258

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jean2026,
  title        = {{Understanding the process of starting up and managing the performance of a refugee enterprise: a critical realist case study}},
  author       = {Jean Claude Mutiganda},
  journal      = {International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmed.2026.151258},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Understanding the process of starting up and managing the performance of a refugee enterprise: a critical realist case study

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.