arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

The Four-Component Instructional Design (4C/ID) Model in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Guojuan Qi et al.

Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice2026https://doi.org/10.53761/dcf7nr70article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Complex skills development in higher education is constrained by fragmented instruction, limited support for whole-task learning and increased cognitive load in online and blended formats. The four-component instructional design (4C/ID) model has been proposed as a task-centred approach designed to address these challenges. This systematic review synthesises empirical applications of 4C/ID in higher education over the past three decades. Following PRISMA 2020, searches of six major databases covered January 1992 to 7 December 2025. Fourteen empirical studies met the inclusion criteria and were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Most were quasi-experimental (n = 10), with two mixed-methods and two pre–post studies; the pooled sample comprised 1,109 students. Research clustered in Asia and North America across education and educational technology, health and computing, with a few studies in language and architecture. Across studies, implementations emphasised whole-task sequencing, scaffold fading and coordinated supportive and procedural information, often supported by digital technologies. Evidence indicates consistent gains in performance and transfer outcomes. Well-sequenced guidance reduced extraneous load and supported germane processing, though intrinsic load was higher early in whole-task learning. Common limitations included small samples, non-random allocation and limited follow-up. Overall, 4C/ID shows promise for improving learning outcomes in higher education. Future work should broaden samples and contexts, strengthen designs, standardise outcome measures and report implementation fidelity to advance both research and practice.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53761/dcf7nr70

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{guojuan2026,
  title        = {{The Four-Component Instructional Design (4C/ID) Model in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review}},
  author       = {Guojuan Qi et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53761/dcf7nr70},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Four-Component Instructional Design (4C/ID) Model in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.