arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Industrial Monuments in Germany: Data Basis and Overview of Regional Structures

Michael Fritsch et al.

Journal of Economics and Statistics2025https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2025-0015article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

We describe the procedure for compiling a list of industrial monuments in the regions of Germany and the resulting data set. This includes detailed insights into the absolute and relative numbers of industrial monuments, categorized into production, traffic, and supply. In addition, we provide an overview of the regional distribution of the number of industrial monuments in Germany. Baden-Wuerttemberg and Bavaria exhibit the largest shares of industrial monuments nationwide, followed by Saxony and North Rhine-Westphalia. Spatial analyses reveal significant regional variations in monument density per population and area, reflecting the historical and cultural heritage shaped by industrialization. The data set, publicly available on the Internet, fills a gap in documenting and analyzing industrial heritage in Germany.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2025-0015

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{michael2025,
  title        = {{Industrial Monuments in Germany: Data Basis and Overview of Regional Structures}},
  author       = {Michael Fritsch et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Economics and Statistics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2025-0015},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Industrial Monuments in Germany: Data Basis and Overview of Regional Structures

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.