Gender Comparison of Latent Coping Profiles in a Representative Sample of College Emerging Adults

Lauren M. DePaul Trumbach et al.

Psychological Reports2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941261442783article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The present study was intended to improve the understanding of how emerging adults in college cope with stress by identifying latent coping typologies and assessing their relationship to demographic and psychosocial factors. 372 undergraduate students completed a battery and five daily diaries online. The five-day averages of 14 coping methods were used for three latent profile analyses. Initially, four profiles were identified. Repeated analysis revealed similar but not identical models when female and male students were analyzed separately. High Coping and Direct Problem Solving typologies emerged in all models. Coping profiles demonstrated moderate-to-strong relationships with stress, positive and negative affect, psychological symptomatology, and stress-related growth. These results support previous findings that emerging adults display at least three coping typologies, there may be slight differences associated with gender and race/ethnicity, and that using more variety of coping strategies may relate to better stress outcomes.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941261442783

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lauren2026,
  title        = {{Gender Comparison of Latent Coping Profiles in a Representative Sample of College Emerging Adults}},
  author       = {Lauren M. DePaul Trumbach et al.},
  journal      = {Psychological Reports},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941261442783},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Gender Comparison of Latent Coping Profiles in a Representative Sample of College Emerging Adults

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.