Unpacking the narrative complexities of YouTube

Merve Özçelik & Julian Canjura

Narrative Inquiry2026https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.25120.ozcarticle
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract This paper introduces a conceptual framework for analyzing social media narratives as socio-technologically situated, multi-authored, and interactionally co-constructed phenomena. While narrative analyses of platforms like YouTube often isolate videos as self-contained stories, we argue that narratives on social media unfold across dynamic webs of interaction involving creators, commenters, viewers, and platform affordances and algorithms. Our framework expands what counts as a narrative on social media by tracing how stories are edited, framed, responded to, and algorithmically shaped across time. Focusing on a YouTube video of an Uber ride posted by a Turkish social media influencer in the US, we demonstrate how multiple co-tellers introduce new interpretations of the recorded events and reshape the narrative for subsequent viewers. By identifying co-tellers and tracing the trajectories of narratives, this framework allows analysts to better examine how narratives, thus discourses and ideologies, evolve, circulate, and impact audiences.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.25120.ozc

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{merve2026,
  title        = {{Unpacking the narrative complexities of YouTube}},
  author       = {Merve Özçelik & Julian Canjura},
  journal      = {Narrative Inquiry},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.25120.ozc},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Unpacking the narrative complexities of YouTube

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.