From Germination to Transformation: Policy Studies in China Over the Past Half‐Century (1970s–2020s)

Shuai Cao et al.

Policy Studies Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70097article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT Over the past half‐century, policy studies in China have undergone a remarkable evolution. This paper seeks to provide a comprehensive analysis of the field's development by tracing its origins and transformations over time. We introduce a time‐based and multifaceted framework that delineates the evolution of policy studies in China into four distinct phases: germination (1978 to mid‐1990s), burgeoning (late 1990s to 2012), normalization (2013 to 2022), and transformation (2023 to present). We first analyze the evolution of each phase in terms of historical contexts, disciplinary development, policy research (including policy domains, theoretical advancements, and methodological approaches), and intellectual engagement with the international policy research community. Drawing on a self‐compiled database of 347 articles, we then present an overview of key trends across these four phases and further analyze the patterns of policy areas, theories of the policy process, and research methodologies for each phase. We conclude the article by identifying major challenges confronting policy studies in China and outlining potential opportunities for advancing the field.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70097

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shuai2026,
  title        = {{From Germination to Transformation: Policy Studies in China Over the Past Half‐Century (1970s–2020s)}},
  author       = {Shuai Cao et al.},
  journal      = {Policy Studies Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70097},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

From Germination to Transformation: Policy Studies in China Over the Past Half‐Century (1970s–2020s)

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.