Privilege or Discrimination? Unraveling the Palliative Mechanism of Gender System Justification among Japanese Women

Yasuko Morinaga & Makoto Hirakawa

Japanese Psychological Research2026https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.70018article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Research has shown that Japanese women often experience high levels of life satisfaction by justifying their country's gender disparity hierarchy. This study explored the mechanisms underlying the palliative function of gender system justification (GSJ). We hypothesized that perception of personal discrimination would mediate the relationship between GSJ and life satisfaction. Contrary to our hypothesis, perception of personal gender‐based privilege, not discrimination, mediated this relationship (Studies 1, 2a, and 2b). Neither perceptions of in‐group discrimination nor privilege mediated the relationship (Studies 2a and 2b). Additionally, no significant mediating effects were observed among men (Studies 1, 2a, and 2b). Across three studies, women who strongly endorse the gender system reported higher life satisfaction by perceiving themselves as personally privileged compared to women who weakly endorsed it. We discuss the possibility that Japan's significant gender gap might contribute to Japanese women perceiving themselves as privileged.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.70018

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yasuko2026,
  title        = {{Privilege or Discrimination? Unraveling the Palliative Mechanism of Gender System Justification among Japanese Women}},
  author       = {Yasuko Morinaga & Makoto Hirakawa},
  journal      = {Japanese Psychological Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.70018},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Privilege or Discrimination? Unraveling the Palliative Mechanism of Gender System Justification among Japanese Women

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.