arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

The comparability effects of principles based standards

David Cabán

American Journal of Finance and Accounting2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ajfa.2025.146006article
ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This paper delves into the impact of transitioning from rules-based to principles-based accounting standards and its effect on financial statement comparability. The study leverages the ASC 606 adoption as a unique event to assess how this shift influenced the comparability of financial statements across industries and its effect on analyst coverage. Drawing upon the foundational work of De Franco et al. (2011) to develop a financial comparability measure, the paper evaluates the research question employing multi-variate regression models to explore potential changes in comparability across firms between the Pre-ASC 606 and the ASC 606 period. The findings indicate an improvement in financial statement comparability at the market level, with a more pronounced effect within industries characterised by high recurring revenues. Furthermore, the study reveals a positive correlation between improved financial statement comparability and increased analyst coverage, implying that enhanced transparency under principles-based accounting standards makes firms more attractive to analysts.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ajfa.2025.146006

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{david2025,
  title        = {{The comparability effects of principles based standards}},
  author       = {David Cabán},
  journal      = {American Journal of Finance and Accounting},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ajfa.2025.146006},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The comparability effects of principles based standards

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.