Map Room Conversations: Mapping Objects

George Tobin & Jane Wess

Area2026https://doi.org/10.1111/area.70081article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This article presents a summary and reflection on our ‘Map Room Conversation’ at the RGS‐IBG Annual International Conference 2024. ‘Mapping Objects’ comprised a session that sought to link together commonalities between two collections from the Royal Geographical Society's archives, both of which had been the focus of PhD research projects based at the Society (both projects were funded via the Arts and Humanities Research Council's Collaborative Doctoral Award scheme—see https://www.rgs.org/our‐collections/research‐using‐our‐collections/collaborative‐doctoral‐research ). The pair of talks considered three‐dimensional aspects of map‐making, both the objects and methods involved in producing maps, and the construction of maps in three dimensions in the form of relief models. The discussion centred on the knowledge required to use and produce the objects, their users, audiences, and varying verisimilitudes. Following earlier calls to refocus cartographic research from representations towards practices (Kitchin and Dodge, Progress in Human Geography , 31, 2007), this collaborative session sought to enliven the objects of mapping and modelling, while interrogating the assumptions of infallibility underlying their usage. Centring audience participation and encouraging their interaction with the archival materials, this Map Room conversation illuminated the varying ways we can envisage and respond to the processes of mapping practices.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/area.70081

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{george2026,
  title        = {{Map Room Conversations: Mapping Objects}},
  author       = {George Tobin & Jane Wess},
  journal      = {Area},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/area.70081},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Map Room Conversations: Mapping Objects

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.