arbiter
JournalsAccount

How Do Auditors' Social Ties and Their Industry Specialization Affect Earnings Management of IPO Firms?

Helen Choy et al.

Journal of International Accounting Research2026https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2024-007article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study investigates how engagement auditors' social ties with investment bankers and engagement auditors' industry specialization affect earnings management among initial public offering (IPO) firms. Using proprietary data from Taiwan—a relationship-oriented market characterized by reciprocal exchange and a high degree of auditor accountability—we explore whether social connections lead to favoritism bias or facilitate effective information sharing. Our findings reveal significantly less accrual-based and real earnings management when engagement auditors are socially connected with investment bankers. Furthermore, the mitigating effect of these ties on earnings management is more pronounced when the auditors are industry specialists, suggesting that industry-specialized knowledge enhances the quality and efficiency of information exchange. Overall, our results highlight the importance of social networks and auditor expertise in promoting audit quality and constraining opportunistic financial reporting in the IPO setting. JEL Classifications: M42; M49; G30.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2024-007

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{helen2026,
  title        = {{How Do Auditors' Social Ties and Their Industry Specialization Affect Earnings Management of IPO Firms?}},
  author       = {Helen Choy et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of International Accounting Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2024-007},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How Do Auditors' Social Ties and Their Industry Specialization Affect Earnings Management of IPO Firms?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.