Environmental Courts and Green Development: Evidence from China

Xiulin Qi et al.

Journal of Development Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2025.2601589article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Environmental courts play an important role in upholding environmental justice and promoting green development. Drawing on the staggered establishment of environmental courts in China since 2007, we adopt a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) framework to assess their impact on green total factor productivity (GTFP). First, we find that cities with environmental courts tend to experience increases in GTFP after their establishment. Second, this effect is more pronounced in regions with stronger governmental environmental commitment, higher enforcement capacity, and non-resource-based urban structures. Third, the mechanism analysis suggests that cities with environmental courts tend to achieve higher GTFP by fostering green innovation, enhancing pollution control, and raising public environmental attention. By adopting an institutional perspective, this paper offers new empirical evidence on the role of environmental courts in advancing green development.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2025.2601589

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{xiulin2026,
  title        = {{Environmental Courts and Green Development: Evidence from China}},
  author       = {Xiulin Qi et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Development Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2025.2601589},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Environmental Courts and Green Development: Evidence from China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.