arbiter
JournalsAccount

Usable and lawful: can consent be both?

Cristiana Santos et al.

Information and Communications Technology Law2026https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2025.2610581article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Under the GDPR, a valid consent must satisfy a number of requirements to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the ePrivacy Directive (ePD). The article evaluates the design of consent banners using a common and popular usability inspection method in human-computer interaction scholarship known as heuristic evaluation, which enables the researcher to identify challenges in technical provision and new generative opportunities for technical systems to better respond to legal requirements. Opportunities, challenges and tensions for a lawful and usable consent are identified through a novel application of usability heuristics to target the intersection of legal requirements and usability in the context of consent banners. These interpretations of the intersection of law and design may aid legal scholars in evaluating the lawfulness and usability of consent design strategies, while acknowledging the tensions and challenges among design and legal perspectives.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2025.2610581

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cristiana2026,
  title        = {{Usable and lawful: can consent be both?}},
  author       = {Cristiana Santos et al.},
  journal      = {Information and Communications Technology Law},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2025.2610581},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Usable and lawful: can consent be both?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.