arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Influence of Motivation, Lender Type, and Dark Triad Personality Characteristics on Loan Application Misrepresentations

Emily S. Keenan et al.

Journal of Forensic Accounting Research2026https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2023-010article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study reports the results of an experiment that examines borrowers’ propensity to misrepresent and misstate information in a hypothetical loan application. The study uses a 2 × 2 between-participants design where the manipulated variables are borrower motivation (selfish or altruistic) and lender type (a private lender or the federal government Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)). Participants’ dark triad characteristics were assessed and treated as a moderator. Participants were asked about their likelihood to misstate the company’s financial statements or misrepresent narrative information provided with their loan application. Participants reported a higher likelihood of misrepresenting narrative information on loan application under selfish (versus altruistic) motivation. They also reported higher likelihood of financial statement misstatement on loan applications to the government (versus private lender). This study sheds light on how the federal PPP may have influenced borrowers’ likelihood to misrepresent or misstate information on loan applications.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2023-010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{emily2026,
  title        = {{The Influence of Motivation, Lender Type, and Dark Triad Personality Characteristics on Loan Application Misrepresentations}},
  author       = {Emily S. Keenan et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Forensic Accounting Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2023-010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Influence of Motivation, Lender Type, and Dark Triad Personality Characteristics on Loan Application Misrepresentations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.