arbiter
JournalsAccount

Mind the Flower: Rebalancing Form and Function in Organization Studies

Stoyan V. Sgourev

Journal of Management Inquiry2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926261416824article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Moving away from a tradition of craft production to an increasingly bureaucratic, mass-produced mode, the field of organization studies is becoming more formulaic. The subfield of “organizational aesthetics” is an example of a potential antidote, a nomadic foray into more exotic research contexts. However, the exploration of aesthetic phenomena for organizational purposes has largely conformed to an entrenched utilitarian paradigm that pursues managerial relevance and prioritizes “function” over “form.” This essay highlights the blocking capacity of the utilitarian paradigm, questioning its assumptions and promoting a non-utilitarian perspective on aesthetics, inspired by the writings and poetry of Jim March. Drawing on art history, I direct attention to the aspects of aesthetic phenomena that militate against organization and commercial exploitation, and stimulate appreciation of beauty, sensory experiences and more elegant, less formulaic writing.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926261416824

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{stoyan2026,
  title        = {{Mind the Flower: Rebalancing Form and Function in Organization Studies}},
  author       = {Stoyan V. Sgourev},
  journal      = {Journal of Management Inquiry},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926261416824},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Mind the Flower: Rebalancing Form and Function in Organization Studies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.