The World Health Organization’s Guidance for Just-in-Time Learning as a Framework for Normatively Responsible Advocacy in Instructional Risk and Crisis Communication

Timothy L. Sellnow & Amy Maciel

Health Communication2026https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2581731article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In this study, normatively responsible advocacy is proposed as a primary objective of instructional risk and crisis communication during health-related crises and high-risk events. The World Health Organization's learning interventions provided to communities and countries during the COVID-19 pandemic serve as a case study. The case study emphasized phronesis in assessing the capacity for normatively responsible advocacy in instructional risk and crisis communication to promote social justice. The case study revealed the recommendations provided in the World Health Organization's, WHO implementation guidance on emergencies capacity-building: Approaches for just-in-time learning response to health emergencies, are fitting with the four tenets of normatively responsible advocacy in instructional risk and crisis communication: (1) balancing cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning; (2) improvisation in designing instructional content; (3) agility in distribution of instructional content; and (4) meeting the normative needs and expectations of diverse audiences.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2581731

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{timothy2026,
  title        = {{The World Health Organization’s Guidance for Just-in-Time Learning as a Framework for Normatively Responsible Advocacy in Instructional Risk and Crisis Communication}},
  author       = {Timothy L. Sellnow & Amy Maciel},
  journal      = {Health Communication},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2581731},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The World Health Organization’s Guidance for Just-in-Time Learning as a Framework for Normatively Responsible Advocacy in Instructional Risk and Crisis Communication

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.