arbiter
JournalsAccount

The green banking gap: How bankability, business models, and regulations challenge banks’ decarbonisation

Nicolás Águila et al.

Competition and Change2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294261431901article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In Europe, banks have been slow to increase green lending while they continue to finance high-GHG-emitting activities, leading to a ‘green banking gap’. Based on 88 interviews, we argue that explanations for the green banking gap can be grouped into three broad categories: bankability, business model, and regulation. First, there are not many green firms and projects that meet banks’ desired risk/return profile, while high-GHG-emitting activities remain bankable. Second, there are constraints to decarbonise banks’ portfolios arising from the change in banks’ business model in recent decades, making (green) corporate and project lending less important. Even when they lend, the characteristics of the lending process imply a bias towards high-GHG-emitting firms, as balance sheets are locked in old loans and banks prioritise long-term relationships with their clients. Finally, there are constraints on green lending and a lack of disincentives to high-GHG-emitting lending arising from financial and sustainability regulations and overall policy uncertainty.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294261431901

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nicolás2026,
  title        = {{The green banking gap: How bankability, business models, and regulations challenge banks’ decarbonisation}},
  author       = {Nicolás Águila et al.},
  journal      = {Competition and Change},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294261431901},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The green banking gap: How bankability, business models, and regulations challenge banks’ decarbonisation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.