Edit Wars: Framing Contests, Argument Structure, and the Meaning of Inequality at Wikipedia

Sean Buchanan et al.

Academy of Management Discoveries2025https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2023.0219article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Collaborative knowledge platforms like Wikipedia influence how individuals understand and interpret issues, yet how the meaning of issues is co-constructed on such platforms is poorly understood. Drawing from a longitudinal study of the discussion of inequality on Wikipedia’s “Capitalism” page, we uncover the process of collective meaning making around contentious issues on collaborative knowledge platforms. Incorporating insights from research on framing and argument structure, we demonstrate how new frames of inequality gain traction on the page. Through an analysis of the frontstage framing contests and backstage negotiations between opposing editors, we find that factors such as emotivity and the characteristics of the frame articulator that can support frame traction in other settings work against it at Wikipedia. Instead, we show how frame traction on these platforms is supported by external social movement activity that stimulates the creation of discursive resources that advance specific frames and the addition of subjective qualifiers that make claims advancing certain frames more palatable to opposing editors. We discuss the implications of these empirical discoveries for research on collaborative platforms and for wider scholarship on collective meaning making around contentious issues.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2023.0219

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sean2025,
  title        = {{Edit Wars: Framing Contests, Argument Structure, and the Meaning of Inequality at Wikipedia}},
  author       = {Sean Buchanan et al.},
  journal      = {Academy of Management Discoveries},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2023.0219},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Edit Wars: Framing Contests, Argument Structure, and the Meaning of Inequality at Wikipedia

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.