Analysis of gender segregation within detailed occupations and industries in Australia

Gerard Lind & Rebecca Colquhoun

Australian Journal of Labour Economics: a journal of labour economics and labour relations2021article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.47

Abstract

This study provides new and detailed estimates of gender segregation in the Australian labour market. Using ABS Labour Force Survey and Census data, we explore and decompose long-term trends of segregation and integration by employing a shiftshare analysis and index measures across time, age and space. We find that over the last three decades, gender segregation has not significantly changed across either industries or occupations. Gender segregation across industries is, in general, more resistant to gender integration than across occupations and detailed classifications are profoundly more segregated than top-level classifications. Additionally, gender segregation increases as individuals get older and the farther they work from urbanised locations. We show that decades of gender equality policy have not had a major impact on minimising labour market segregation. Women continue to have more constrained labour supply choices than men, hindering labour market efficiency and flexibility.

7 citations

Cite this paper

@article{gerard2021,
  title        = {{Analysis of gender segregation within detailed occupations and industries in Australia}},
  author       = {Gerard Lind & Rebecca Colquhoun},
  journal      = {Australian Journal of Labour Economics: a journal of labour economics and labour relations},
  year         = {2021},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Analysis of gender segregation within detailed occupations and industries in Australia

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.47

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.31 × 0.4 = 0.12
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.