An exception that proves the rule: Japanese monetary policy under the classical gold standard, 1897–1914

Shinji Takagi

Financial History Review2025https://doi.org/10.1017/s0968565025000010article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The article investigates whether the Bank of Japan followed the so-called rules of the game under the classical gold standard. The article, by estimating a vector autoregressive model of monthly timeseries data for October 1897 to July 1914, finds that the Japanese central bank systematically raised the discount rate in response to a fall in the ratio of monetary gold to banknotes, a worsening of the trade balance, or a depreciation of the Japanese yen against the British pound. In contrast, the discount rate hardly responded to the Bank of England's Bank Rate, suggesting Japan's limited financial integration with Europe. The article argues that the Bank of Japan used the trade balance and the yen–sterling rate as the signals of a proximate or prospective movement in monetary gold. The findings, therefore, strongly suggest that the Bank of Japan sought to preserve gold convertibility as the primary objective of monetary policy. The Japanese central bank's rules-of-the-game-like behaviour challenges the semi-consensual view in the literature that violations of the rules were frequent and pervasive under the classical gold standard.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0968565025000010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shinji2025,
  title        = {{An exception that proves the rule: Japanese monetary policy under the classical gold standard, 1897–1914}},
  author       = {Shinji Takagi},
  journal      = {Financial History Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0968565025000010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

An exception that proves the rule: Japanese monetary policy under the classical gold standard, 1897–1914

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.