Eliciting claims development patterns and costs hidden in backlogs

Filip Lindskog & Mario V. Wüthrich

European Actuarial Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-025-00431-warticle
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Random delays between the occurrence of accident events and the corresponding reporting times of insurance claims is a standard feature of insurance data. The time lag between the reporting and the processing of a claim depends on whether the claim can be processed without delay as it arrives or whether it remains unprocessed for some time because of temporarily insufficient processing capacity that is shared between all incoming claims. We aim to explain and analyze the nature of processing delays and build-up of backlogs. Development patterns for incoming reported claims that form the basis for claims reserving may be distorted by backlogs when transformed into processed (or paid) claims. In a first step, we show how to infer hidden development patterns from processed claims data. In a second step, we discuss how backlogs impact claims costs, and we show how to select processing capacity optimally in order to minimize claims costs, taking delay-adjusted costs and fixed costs for claims settlement capacity into account. Theoretical results are combined with a large-scale numerical study that demonstrates practical usefulness of our proposal.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-025-00431-w

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{filip2025,
  title        = {{Eliciting claims development patterns and costs hidden in backlogs}},
  author       = {Filip Lindskog & Mario V. Wüthrich},
  journal      = {European Actuarial Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-025-00431-w},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Eliciting claims development patterns and costs hidden in backlogs

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.