Ecologies of Research Writing in Chinese Universities

Ibrar Bhatt & Xiao Chen

Written Communication2025https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883251349202article
ABDC B
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

This study explores how the scholarly writing practices of early-career academics in China create new “ecologies” of research writing. Using a literacy studies framing, we examine how productivity policies, including evaluation and incentivization, impact the writing practices of academics working in the humanities and social sciences (HSS), creating a set of spatiotemporal predicaments and uncertainties. We draw on interviews and multimodal journals obtained from 22 academics at Chinese universities. Findings reveal important practices among China’s HSS academics within the distinctive institutional and policy landscape of Chinese academia, including how they organize their space and time for writing, the significance and function of writing practices, and the ways in which boundaries are disrupted and negotiated. We show that writing is deeply intertwined with multiple spaces and times, forming an ecology of research writing within emergent and shifting assemblages. We emphasize the need for further theoretical and practical understanding of research writing in the context of Chinese universities.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883251349202

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ibrar2025,
  title        = {{Ecologies of Research Writing in Chinese Universities}},
  author       = {Ibrar Bhatt & Xiao Chen},
  journal      = {Written Communication},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883251349202},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Ecologies of Research Writing in Chinese Universities

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.