Time, Space, and Tools: A Materio-cognitive Model of Digital Writing Process Development

Matthew Overstreet et al.

Written Communication2026https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883251410154article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This article uses a novel theoretical frame—materio-cognitivism—to explore how digital writing processes change with time and experience. Researchers observed 10 second langauge writers as they completed two research writing tasks—one at the start of their first year of university and one near the end of university. Interviews and screen recording were used to track writing activity. Five key writing strategies were identified. Among the most improved writers, researchers identified a set of shared changes in how writing strategies were deployed. In particular, the most improved writers showed increased ability to sequence subtasks, to arrange digital interfaces, and to combine internal cognitive functions with the affordances of digital tools. These findings suggest what the development of writing processes might look like in digital environments, potentially informing both writing pedagogy and assessment.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883251410154

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{matthew2026,
  title        = {{Time, Space, and Tools: A Materio-cognitive Model of Digital Writing Process Development}},
  author       = {Matthew Overstreet et al.},
  journal      = {Written Communication},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883251410154},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Time, Space, and Tools: A Materio-cognitive Model of Digital Writing Process Development

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.